London 2012 artwork stirs controversy amongst critics

The official posters for the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic games in London were unveiled last Friday and feature contributions from a cross-section of some of the UK’s most highly regarded artists. Critics are nonetheless questioning whether these designs truly represent the best of British creativity. 

The reaction is perhaps unsurprising and speaks to a conundrum that will no doubt rear its head in any situation where a finite number of creatives are tasked with defining the visual identity of a much larger entity – in this case a nation of millions. The same thing happened with the selection of poster artwork, logos, and mascot for the FIFA World Cup 2010, and we’re willing to bet that similar impasses will continue to define public unveilings of official artwork for national events. And rightly so. There are few occasions when art and design infiltrate the public consciousness as widely as they do for mega-events like the World Cup or Olympic Games; where the average person has the right to weigh in on matters of aesthetics and identity. But considering that many design critics are designers themselves, one is probably justified in questioning whether any outcry stems from genuine national interest or simply the acrid taste of sour grapes.

Perhaps the most telling creative decision by the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) was to employ the services of reputable artists, as opposed to graphic designers. The poster, after all, does occupy an almost sacred echelon in the pantheon of graphic design.

According to LOCOG, “The primary objective of the panel was artistic excellence and some of the UK’s greatest artists have been commissioned (four of the chosen artists have previously won the Turner Prize and five have represented the UK at the Venice Biennale). The brief for the artists encouraged them to celebrate the Games coming to London and to look at the values of the Olympic and Paralympic games.  Each image is a distinct interpretation of either the Olympic or Paralympic Games by the individual artists and the diversity of the series demonstrates the extraordinary creative talent that exists within the UK.”

Nevertheless, some of the comments gleaned from design blog Dezeen reflect the tepid response to the selection:

“Commissioning 12 of London’s leading graphic designers would seen (sic) a better result.”

“I am lost for words… not in a good way!”

“None of them are (sic) impressive.”

We feel that GraphiteSquare hits the nail on the head, albeit somewhat diplomatically:

“All in all it gives a fairly accurate depiction of the diversity of British artists. This for me is their strength. Luckily they’re not to everyone’s taste and will create lots of debate. Good, better than being predictable!”